Obtaining a Certificate of Authenticity (COA) for an Old Master painting through scientific analysis

Obtaining a Certificate of Authenticity (COA) for an Old Master painting through scientific analysis can add credibility, but only under strict conditions. Here's a breakdown of what you need to know:

When Scientific Analysis Is Credible:

1. Conducted by Renowned Laboratories or ExpertsInstitutions like C2RMF (Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France), or private labs with a solid reputation in pigment dating, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), or dendrochronology (for panel paintings), give scientific findings weight.

2. Supports Connoisseurship-Based AttributionsScience is most credible when it corroborates expert opinion—not when it stands alone. For example:

   • A canvas dated to ~1610 fits with a proposed attribution to Rubens.

   • A pigment discovered was only in use after the artist died → evidence against authenticity.

3. Integrated into a Scholarly Report, Not Just Raw DataScientific tests must be interpreted within an art historical context. Raw data without contextual analysis is easily misused.

4. In Conjunction with Provenance and Stylistic StudyScience alone rarely proves authorship. It may confirm:

   • Age of materials

   • Later restorations or alterations

   • Workshop vs. master handBut it must be combined with stylistic, documentary, and market history analysis.

   

When It’s Not Enough—or Even Misleading:

1. "Scientific COAs" Without Expert ConsensusA report showing “the pigments are from the 17th century” is not a certificate of authorship. Many fakes are made using old materials.

2. Used to Circumvent Expert ReviewSome sellers use scientific reports to distract from lack of cataloguing, poor provenance, or rejection from the catalogue raisonné.

3. Issued by Unqualified PartiesA “COA” issued by someone without standing in the Old Masters field (no academic publications, auction house experience, or museum affiliations) is not taken seriously by the art market.

Best Practice for a COA on an Old Master:

• Hire a qualified Old Master specialist (ideally with auction, museum, or scholarly credentials).

• Use scientific analysis to support their opinion, not as the main evidence.

• If possible, obtain a written statement by a known authority (recognized scholar, author of catalogue raisonné, or former museum curator).

• Have the report include:

  • Stylistic analysis

  • Provenance history

  • Condition report

  • Technical imaging (e.g., IR, UV, X-ray)

  • Scientific tests with interpretive conclusions

Final Word:

Scientific analysis can strengthen a COA—but it’s not enough on its own. In the Old Master field, what gives a COA true market and legal weight is the combination of connoisseurship, technical analysis, and provenance—ideally backed by a respected expert or institution.

If you’re dealing with a specific painting or artist, I can help you evaluate what kind of COA or expert opinion would be market-credible.

www.fae.llc